Erik's Blog: Discussing open source innovation, personal fabrication and a ...

We demonstrated the RepRap at NPOX (15 nov. 2009).

It was in the "Beeld en Geluid" building which was a huge building, but beautiful at every scale.

We were positively surprised by the way our project was advertised on pamphlets that were passed around and people seemed to know about it in advance. The visitors were eager to learn what was going on and posed questions ranging from how the technology worked, to how this could impact innovation and how this potentially changes the world. Some also asked how long it would take for this technology to reach the home. I think the RepRap needs some 'domestication' but it shouldn't need to take long. More important drivers and inhibitors are social and dependent on other flexible production technologies and services that might be an alternative.

The RepRap Day at Protospace (14 nov. 2009) was a great success.


(see also, more pictures by Bas)

The plan was to print an entire machine at the event, but we did more talking than actual printing, which was fine. Some whistles were printed by Joost. I printed two Bowden cable clips for a second Bowden extruder. The plan is to use this setup for multi-material printing!

All in all, it was a REALLY nice day with lots of great people who were either very interested in the concept of RepRap, FabLab and/or building a RepRap themselves. We had about 10 machines there (not even all of them were on the table!), including Joost's Makerbot, several RepRaps, an acrylic RapMan and an plyRap (from plywood).

Now I still need to blog the NPOX festival in Hilversum, and Manchester and Nottingham trips... doh!

In the previous post, I described the rationale for adding a support material capability. It's not needed for every object, but to have consistent results with tight tolerances, for many objects you cannot do without it. Also, by solving the support material challenge, we will also solve multi-material 3D printing, since both require multiple print head functionality.

Last week I had the pleasure of directly working with Chris Palmer, a.k.a. "nophead". His important findings have really made a difference to the results of many, and guided the RepRap towards better quality in terms of extruder design, countering warping, material capabilities, etc. Personally, seeing the results he achieved was a real motivation not to give up! Seeing solved the problem of oozing for PLA and ABS by reversing the stepper motor. The idea obviously wasn't new, but the great result with this implementation was startling! This change is compatible with the Mendel design and any version two extruder from the RepRap project, as well as most custom built stepper based extruders. Besides solving oozing, a more important problem is solved, the material that oozes should have been part of the object. Especially with thin walled objects, it's can make a section very weak. And since it's the weakest link (or layer) that allows you to break a part, this has for me at least been a source of problems (weaker objects). When the thermoplastic has welded together properly, it should be very hard to break most parts. With weak sections it becomes a lot easier to break them.

But back to our main topic: support material!
Another thing that I was interested in seeing that I could dissolve PLA (polylactic acid), which is biodegradable, in caustic soda (lye, or NaOH). If you make an ABS object supported by PLA, the PLA should resist the ABS' tendency to warp during the building of the object. Since PLA is harder than ABS, it provides a stiff support. This worked really well. We could, with varying temperatures get a from a very strong weld, to an (easy to remove) weak weld. This would allow us to break away bigger chunks of PLA for recycling and dissolve any remaining PLA in a lye or detergent solution.

In our experiment, we printed a slab of PLA, with a block of ABS on top of it. On top of that was another layer of PLA.

From RepRap Dev

Above is the part made of ABS and PLA that we tore loose from the PLA base. The weld took several kilograms (or actually newtons) of force to tear them apart.

From RepRap Dev

I could break loose the PLA that was printed on top of the ABS, but only after fiddling with it a lot and finally putting some more force on it (we didn't measure how much, though).

From RepRap Dev

In part three, I intend to actually print with multiple materials on the Darwin based setup that I have. I already made two extruders, of which one is working very well, using the bowden cable. Adding a second extrusion head would add virtually no weight, since the driving mechanisms are on the frame of the machine (not on a moving part). This allows us to print at higher speeds. For this, I would need to:

• setup another temperature control system,
• get the second extruder to extrude reliably and
• make sure that it switches extruders in software.
• Make sure that the other stepper motor is driven (add hardware as well). I intend to share direction and enable pins between extruders.
• Also, it should offset all of the coordinates. I don't want to do this in firmware, since I like to keep complexity at the side of the host (also more flexbily changed, no need for re-programming). Then again, it's a matter of taste.
• I should level the heads, so that they are in exactly the same plane.